欢迎来到啄木鸟教育,美国留学解决方案提供者!

白图
托福首页托福动态托福备考托福机经高分案例|报考指南托福口语托福写作托福阅读托福听力托福词汇托福真题资料库|提分课程官方报考指南托福VS雅思

2018年9月8日托福写作真题分析

2018-09-10来源: 啄木鸟教育浏览量:
分享到:

       2018年9月8日托福考试难度怎么样?托福写作部分考了什么话题?啄木鸟教育老师为大家带来关于本次托福写作考试的专业分析,希望对大家有所帮助。

  综合点评:

  综合写作属于利弊反驳类,语料内容参考TPO 38综合作文。独立写作为科技教育结合的话题,难度系数低,语料内容参考TPO 10;TPO 11;TPO 12

  综合写作

  话题分类:社会科学/利弊

  考题回忆:总论点讲座人反驳了阅读中中提到的在西海岸建high-speed trains 的三个好处

  阅读部分:

  1)便宜,减少道路维护费用;

  2)方便,缓解交通拥堵;

  3)环保,环境友好。

  听力部分:

  1)建设费用昂贵,借钱修铁路;

  2)去车站不方便;

  3)不是在所有的方面,都环保,generate brand-new problems that might not be resolved.

  解题思路:先总括总论点提出听力和阅读之间的对立关系。再在body 段落首句分别阐述听力部分的主要观点,作为body 段落主题句,再用听力和阅读的细节进行对比支撑

  参考范文:Introduction

  The lecturer revises the main idea mentioned in the reading that establishing railway lines in the western part of the United states can generate advantages. He argues that each of the benefits, if examined thoroughly, would be groundless, by citing the problems related to economy, efficiency and environment.

  Body 1

  To begin with, the professor argues that the idea of railway lines being cost-effective, as is illustrated in the reading passage, is groundless. According to the reading passage, building bullet trains could connect the western part closer together, which reduces expenditure on other traffic alternative, thus enhancing the use of spending on railway tracks. In opposition to this argument, the professor contends that charges for the construction could be as high as the states involved might borrow money, based on the idea that the construction materials, such as the raw material for the rail tracks and the assembling of the rocket trains, are all not cheap.

  Body 2

  On top of that, the second bonus, the relief of traffic pressure, does not please the lecturer either. The reading passage describes how the railway construction could enhance traffic efficiency by offering alternative to traffic. On the contrary, the professor states that instead of relieving the traffic efficiency, the construction of rail way routes may lead to congestion due to the inconvenience of traffic routes around the train station. This defies the efficiency attribute of building railway lines.

  Body3

  Lastly, the professor rebuts the reading’s point that this practice can hardly promote environment, by stating that building railway routes for high speed trains could generate brand-new problems that might not be easily resolved, which defies the original purpose of preserving the environment. The professor points out that. Building railway routes could contribute to more employment of carbon burning to generate the material, suggesting that carbon emission could be as high as, if not higher than ,using the current traffic system, which indicates it as a less environmentally friendly way of transportation.

  Conclusion

  All the information points to the fact that construction of high speed trains might not be as beneficial as it appears, but rather could bring detrimental effects to the economy, the efficiency and the environmental preservation.

  独立写作

  话题分类:教育话题和科技话题结合

  考题回忆:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

  Professor should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class.

  解题思路:分析大学课堂上禁止使用科技产品的利弊,并根据立场进行酌情反驳

  参考范文:Introduction

  Traditionally, undergraduates have been using paper-based text-books, materials, and other attached utensils to facilitate the classes during the sessions, yet with electronic devices prevailing in people’s lives, the equipments with internet access have become increasingly pervasive, and accompanying college students nearly from now and then. This has triggered great controversy as to whether lecturers should prohibit the employment of these devices during the classes. My view is that forbidding these undergraduates from using the electronic devices with internet access is not a good idea and should be discouraged in the university, in spite of the disturbances that this might bring to the courses and the students.

  Body 1

  One argument against allowing the college students to tap the e-devices might involve the learning efficiency that the professor want to maintain for the undergraduates from forbidding the use of e-devices. This is because by prohibiting the use of the electronic devices, students would be removed the likely distractors of the courses, so that they are less likely to be distracted by the appealing headlines, discount information or gossips of personalities during the sessions of the lecture. It is such prohibition that allows for the students to have less access to less learning information, thus being able to be more involved in the discussion or group work. This situation, nevertheless, seldom occurs. The students in college and university are often adults, instead of children, who are capable of being self-controlled and disciplined, and this means that the electronic devices might not affect their concentration and devotion to the courses.

  Body 2

  A further reason for not using the lap tops, cell phones and e-book readers may be that this could jeopardize the students creativity. If students were forbidden in terms of using the internet access, then they might be encouraged to think out of the box and dedicate themselves to thinking of the questions proposed by the professor, triggering more innovative ideas and enhancing their renovation of ideas in the field they study. However, people with such argument are short-sighted. Just because of allowing them access to internet does not mean their creativity could be impeded. This is mainly due to the fact that database on the internet might function as fantastic ways of expanding their creativity. For example, in the medical school, it is having access to internet that allows students, when losing ideas in responding appropriately to the professors’ question about the therapies of a disease, as well as their benefits and drawbacks, to do research and figure out more solutions to the same diseases, thus generating potentials to new ideas and being open-minded. This of course enhances their skills of being innovative, especially in terms of the content and methods of thinking creatively.

  Conclusion

 

  In conclusion, any thing that encourage the use of internet-based equipment could benefit the college students in terms of learning efficiency and creativity and not prohibiting them to have internet access during the lectures benefits individuals. I wish that professors would be open to the use of internet access and allow the students to make these benefits more achievable.

 

       >>>2018年9月8日托福真题回忆及分析汇总

         以上解析部分由环球教育苏州学校 杨晓娟老师原创,转载请注明作者及出处。



本文关键字:2018年9月8日托福写作,托福考试真题,托福真题分析
编辑: Li
分享到:
我要咨询

关注啄木鸟

啄木鸟教育
ID:zmnedu
美国留学方案提供者
因为专业 所以出色

美国留学快报
ID:liuxuekuaibao
传递美国留学资讯动态
美国大学申请技巧

抢占美国TOP50名校入学名额,先人一步提前规划,免费申请高端美国留学方案!

X
X验证码已发送到您的手机,请确认

X您的信息提交成功,稍后啄木鸟教育留学申请专家会与您联系,请保持手机畅通。